It’s been a while (August) since we had a Us vs It entry but with vaccines starting to go into people’s arms, we have reached a new stage in this siege.
Even as we remain absorbed by the fight against the Coronavirus, we must start thinking of what comes after.
We will be different when we emerge from this plague. We will see in a glaring spotlight the shortcomings in our American system of doing things. The list of issues, which must be addressed in ways that bridge a chasm of partisanship, will be long and should be inescapable.
Tough and thorough evaluations need to be made at the federal and state levels of the conditions of our readiness in the current situation and our preparations for readiness for the next wave. The evaluations are too important for Congress or for state legislatures. We need the brutal honesty of something like the Kerner Commission of the late 1960s.
Given social unrest that has flared during this time of the plague, it is good to recall the Kerner Commission not only to prove the point of this post but to highlight what it said more than fifty years ago that is tragically too close to life today.
Many, if not most, of those who read these entries might be too young to remember the commission appointed by President Johnson and headed by former Illinois Governor Otto Kerner. It was formed after disastrous racial violence in 25 cities that far exceeded anything we saw in Ferguson a few years ago or that we have seen in some cities more recently. The commission’s final report was brutal. It warned that this country was so divided that it was on the verge of becoming two “radically unequal societies—one black, one white.”
We won’t discuss here how accurate that forecast might still be—because we are talking about a different issue that deserves the same tough examination and, if necessary, the same brutal honesty in its assessment. There are many who think the Kerner Commission’s report, and its severe final assessment, fell on deaf ears. The assessment of what our state and nation need to do in the face of massive threats to our health and to our economy deserves the same severe approach but certainly not the same outcome.
We might need new laws and new regulations to make us better prepared in the public and the private sector for the next pandemic. It would be unwise to dismiss such things as once-in-a-century events. Our world has changed and is changing and it’s clear that nothing seems to be constant anymore. And we do not know if our changing world produces a climate more susceptible to new and deadly viruses.
Even now, we recognize the failure to find ways to keep rural hospitals open and the inadequacy of internet communications in many areas (that provide telehealth services, in particular) can no longer be ignored and tolerated. We are learning that science cannot be dismissed and that those whose roles involve anticipating the next sweeping illness or the next world outbreak must regain their numbers and their status. We are learning that our healthcare system always must be prepared, staffed, and equipped for the worst—and must not be in a position of determining who lives or dies based on personal financial standing.
We need to be ready at the state level. But pandemics have a tendency to overcome even the best state preparations and financial capabilities. A national crisis requires national leadership, national empathy, and national cooperation with states. It is unfortunately true that states can’t print money but the federal government can and money is a gigantic factor in fighting pandemics all the way down to the smallest communities.
Our experiences might teach us new things about distance learning and suggest some significant changes in our country’s elementary and secondary (and collegiate) education systems.
The economic paralysis should teach us to look more closely at a trend in jobs that we have noticed but to which we haven’t given enough attention—-the growing tendency to use independent contractors instead of having fulltime employees. The independent contractors often get no fringe benefits and that can have some long-term impacts on retirements but especially (as in times like this) on healthcare. The number of people who live on commissions and tips who have neither opportunities to create retirement plans nor the money to buy health insurance will grow as our economy changes and their lives should not be imperiled when our country is next ravaged by a new pandemic.
Likewise, the pandemic-caused work-from-home operations will have taught us things about large offices and the need for them. The entire business model of large buildings for a single business, or single floors in a large building for one company might change because of what we have learned about working away from a central headquarters. The sweatshop still exists in our country but it is rare because of labor laws, fire safety codes, unions, and minimum wage laws that have curtailed those conditions. Will the Coronavirus doom cubicle farms tomorrow? Will is lead to a rise in union activity?
What will all of this mean in terms of society—-social gatherings, organizational memberships, business-employee relationships, civic clubs, churches?
We will be remiss if we do not anticipate tomorrow’s society based on what we are learning from today’s pandemic.
Our world is changing in so many categories—climate, economics, education, health, communications—that we cannot continue to have society as usual.
If it takes new laws and new regulations to do something as simple as making sure our healthcare institutions and services maintain adequate supplies of protective apparel, equipment and facilities for treatment, let’s have them.
To those who would say such positions represent government overreach, there is a basic response. Government has a role when the private sector abuses its liberties or fails its responsibilities. There is no lack of discussion in these times that such things have happened. There also is no lack of discussion about how government, itself, has failed to meet its responsibilities to the people who entrust it with their well-being.
All of these issues and more need to be addressed so we know what will come after the virus has gone away. That’s why new Kerner-type Commissions are needed at the state and federal levels. We are at a point in our existence where the blunt findings are needed and cannot be put on a shelf. And we, as people, cannot be afraid to address the issues that will be forcefully put in front of us.
Here is a key point:
These commissions should not include elected officials as members. Partisan Foxes do not belong in Pandemic Assessment Hen Houses.
We appreciate the work our public officials are trying to do in difficult times. It is time to work on the instant issue without wasting time casting blame. But it is time also to start thinking of what comes after, and what comes after must be an unblinking hard assessment of what is present and what is needed to deal with the next health or economic or health/economic crises that will visit us. We cannot be afraid to do what is needed.
It might make no difference to our generation if we fail to act. But other generations will sicken and die if we don’t.