How many times will we hear the cheap, vague, promise to “fight big government” in this campaign year. Candidates pressed by their voters—and the voters need to do this is great intensity—might come up with a statement that equally cheap and vague.
We’ve run into someone who actually thinks about that. He’s also realistic about what needs to happen—and what realistically can NOT happen,
Maybe he’s just whistling in the wind, but Professor Donald Kettl is suggesting the push toward smaller government is counterproductive. He’s not arguing for bigger government but he does argue that there is an alternative to the philosophy that cutting “the size” of government is the silver bullet that will solve government’s problems.
Kettl is a former dean of the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy and is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, one of the most prominent think tanks in Washington. It calls itself non-partisan although media reports put it barely on the left side of the liberal-conservative scale (53 on a scale of 100). Regardless of where you fall on that scale, his observations are worth evaluating.
Unlike many who rail against “big government” or proclaim government is “too big,” Kettl puts some serious thought behind what his contentions.
Kettle begins his 2016 book, Escaping Jurassic Government, with an observation partisans on both side of the government aisle seem to agree on: “There is a large and growing gap in American government, between what people expect government to do and what government can actually accomplish.” Government, he offers, comes out poorly when the public compares what it can do with what the private sector does, an image worsened by the cynical “and sometimes nasty view” expressed through social media.
But he points to the contradictory nature of the public’s attitude toward government when he speaks of “citizens’ rising—and sometimes impossible—expectations about what government ought to do for them,” and continues, “No matter the issue, the first instinct when problems arise, even among the biggest advocates for smaller government, is to see government as the cavalry and wonder why it doesn’t arrive faster to help save the day….Almost no one likes big government, but no one expects to have to cope with problems alone.”
The result is what he calls Jurassic government. “Like the dinosaurs, government is strong and powerful. But like the forces that led the dinosaurs to extinction, government is failing to adapt to the challenges it faces. American government struggles with its most important and fundamental decisions. Even worse, it too often fails to deliver on the decisions it makes. That wastes scarce public money and leaves citizens disappointed,” he writes.
How did we get here? It’s simple, he says. This country has lost its commitment to competence in government. And he argues that competence cannot be restored simply by cutting funding for programs and agencies.
His book focuses on the federal government. But the points it makes apply, too, to state government. The goal, he says, is competence, not necessarily size. “We need to restore government’s capacity to deliver on what we decide as a country we ought to accomplish…We do have it within our grasp to restore confidence that what the government seeks to do it will do well.” But it won’t be easy.
Kettl notes that the growth of government has been a bipartisan affair—Democrats creating three and turning one into two. Republicans have created three new departments and have reduced one (Nixon kicked the Post Office out of the cabinet). But in terms of the thirty-two countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States has has fewer government employees as a share of the national workforce than the average among the OECD countries). It might be surprising to realize that only one in eight federal bureaucrats work for the federal government. Government spending as a share of the economy is less than the average spending of those 32 nations. Kettl says government employment has been flat at the state and local levels since the days of Ronald Reagan. The number of local government workers has increased, however, as population has increased.
Is privatization the answer to reducing government costs? Kettl maintains it is not and, in fact, reduces accountability. He cites several instances in which government has been criticized for failing to do its job—but it is the private contractor to whom that job has been outsourced that has failed—and accountability has suffered.
He notes the greatest increases in government costs is in entitlement programs while total government spending has stayed pretty flat.
He thinks liberals who want to increase government spending won’t get far because slow long-term economic growth will not provide much new money to pay for many initiatives. And while conservatives want to cut government spending, most of the federal budget is consumed by payments on the national debt, entitlements, and defense spending.
At the state level, he says, the outlook is not good. “The U. S. Government Accountability Office forecasts that state and local governments could face structural deficits for the next fifty years,” he writes. Aging populations will put pressures on state governments while public opposition to higher taxes “make it unlikely” that state spending will grow.
The upshot of all of this, he suggests, is-–as he puts it in one of his chapter titles—“Government’s Size Can’t Change (Much),” and to condense much of the book into a line or two: cutting government’s ability to pay its bills only reduces government’s ability to do the things it is supposed to do well.
There is much, much more in Kettl’s book, a lot of it challenging traditional political rhetoric. He thinks today’s efforts to “cut” government size actually is cutting government’s competence and it is the declining competence of government that creates a distrustful public that criticizes the government for not meeting its obligations. It seems to this reader that he is pleading for those in government as well as those who pay government’s bills and want government services to throw away the bumper stickers and to put on their thinking caps.
If you’re in government, his study is worth reading. If you are one of those paying the taxes and taking the services, it’s worth reading, too.
The dinosaurs, he says, didn’t think about the changing world around them and move realistically to adapt. And we know what happened to them.
We think that his thoughts are worth serious consideration whether you’re the 53 or the 47 on the liberal/conservative scale.
Escaping Jurassic Government: How to Recover America’s Lost Commitment to Competence, by Donald F. Kettl, published by Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2016.
0000