Might one offer an observation about the extensive coverage of rainfall by the television weatherfolk? They do an excellent job when weather is awful except for one thing.
What does it mean when they say the Missouri River is expected to crest at—for example—32.3 feet at Jefferson City? Will there be 32 feet of water over the Jefferson City Airport? Or in the River Bottom area west of the Capitol? Will the community garden in what once was Cedar City (and the nearby Highway 63) have 32 feet of water over it?
Uh, no.
When we did flood stories at the Missourinet, we never used numbers like that. Here’s why.
Flood stage at Jefferson City is 23 feet. That means that a Corps of Engineers river gauge is someplace that measures the bank of the Missouri River at 723 feet above sea level. The altitude changes as the river flows east or downhill. (Bank full at Washington is only 720 feet, or “20 feet” as is commonly said.) Any water higher than that means the river is out of its banks.
So, 32 feet means the river is nine feet above bank full at Jefferson City. It always seemed to us to be more meaningful to report the river was expected to crest nine feet over flood stage. And a flood stage at 30.2 feet at Washington means the river will be about ten feet above bank full there. Nine feet and ten feet are more meaningful to people who are five-feet-ten inches tall than thirty-two feet.
The record flood crest at Jefferson City in 1993, by the way was 38.65 feet, or as we reported it, 15.65 feet over flood stage. There’s a graphic example of the accuracy of reporting flooding using the 15.65 feet standard we used. Go to the restaurant at the airport and look at the markings on the door which record the levels of various floods. The mark for the 1993 flood is almost at the ceiling level of the restaurant, about sixteen feet up, not thirty-two.
Having gotten that out of my craw—-
-0-
A few days before the end of the legislative session, your observer watched some of the debate in the House about whether undocumented immigrants living in Missouri should be denied in-state tuition and financial aid when attending our state colleges and universities.
Among those banned from paying in-state tuition and financial assistance using tax dollars were the DACA people, children brought here at a young age by their undocumented parents. The legislation says the state universities can use their own resources to provide that assistance or to make up the difference between in-state tuition and international student tuition.
The Columbia Daily Tribune had a story about then noting there were 6,000 people in Missouri approved for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or eligible for it.
A thought occurred during the discussion: Why couldn’t our universities, state or private, offer a course for those students that would lead to American citizenship, online for adults and especially for DACA high school students and current college students? Might solve a few problems.
Might not be a bad idea to have a lot of our non-DACA students enroll, too.
-0-
Come to think of it: The capitol is awash in third-graders each spring, students who are taking their courses in Missouri government. They sit in the visitors’ galleries for a few minutes and are introduced by their legislator and given a round of applause and then go downstairs to look at the old stage coach and the mammoth tooth.
It will be nine years before they graduate, months ahead of casting their first vote. That’s a long time to remember what they saw and learned as third-graders.
I THINK I can remember the name of my teacher and the building I attended in third grade. But that didn’t make me qualified to cast a learned vote the first time I had the chance to do so.
-0-
I was driven out of retirement this year to lobby for the steamboat museum bill in the legislature. The opportunity to help do something great for my town and my state forced me back into coat and tie more times in the last four months than I have worn them in the last four years. I found that I was regularly turning the wrong way to get to a meeting with a legislator in the most efficient way. I had forgotten my way around the Capitol.
I confess there are some things I liked about being a lobbyist and being back in the capitol while the legal sausage was being made. In all of my years as a reporter, my contacts with legislators were arms-length business arrangements. As a lobbyist I got to spend a half-hour or more—sometimes less—in the office talking to lawmakers. And I met some REALLY interesting people, particularly the members of this year’s freshman class.
But, boy, did I miss my guilt-free naps. (A few times I hid behind a column in a side gallery of the House and snatched a doze—but those instances sometimes ran afoul of a school group that came in to see five minutes of debate that I’m sure didn’t teach them a darned thing about their government in action. Or inaction.) And living by my own clock. And going around in tennis shoes all day. And going to the Y three days a week for the fellowship there that replaced the relationships I had while I was working.
But the chambers are dark and cool now. And my naps have returned. Until January when we take a stronger, better organized run at building a National Steamboat Museum in Jefferson City. You’re welcome to join the effort.
-0-
It was interesting to know that some things haven’t changed at all. About three weeks before the end of the session, the place starts to get kind of squirrelly. That’s about when the House gets all huffy because the Senate hasn’t turned fully to debating House-passed bills. And the Senate gets in a snit because the House hasn’t switched to Senate-passed bills. And the budget isn’t done with the deadline looming.
In the second week, a purported compromise budget comes out and the chambers start and stop on no particular schedule depending on who’s filibustering what bill or which chamber thinks its conferees didn’t stand up for their chamber’s priorities, and whether to stop the entire process to have more conferences on a small part of a multi-billion dollar budget, and the Senate decides a “day” can actually last until sunrise the next morning or longer.
And the last week when legislators are like desert-crossing cattle who catch a whiff of water in the distance and scramble to get a bill dead a month ago resurrected and added to something moderately akin to the topic, thereby adding to the legend that “nothing is dead in the Senate until the gavel falls at 6 p.m. on the last Friday.” And, oh, what a blessing that falling gavel is.
-0-
The end of a session today is nothing compared to the days when the odd-year sessions ended at MIDNIGHT on June 15, usually with a “midnight special” appropriations bill just before adjournment that created funding for new programs approved during the session. The only people who knew what was in it likely were the people who hay-baled it together in the closing hours. Pandemonium hardly describes those nights when everybody was beyond exhaustion and more than a few were seriously—shall we say “impaired?”—because of social visits to numerous offices which were well-equipped with adult liquids.
And at midnight, many lawmakers went out to the Ramada Inn to celebrate surviving another session. The Capitol press corps would start writing stories about the session, a process that was not nearly as much fun as falling in the swimming pool at the Ramada. Both groups would pack it in about sunrise—except for those of us who had newscasts all day Saturday.
One of the best things the legislature ever did was change the adjournment time to 6 p.m. on a Friday night.
Now—-
If we could only get rid of term limits now—–