Eric Greitens thought the Missouri governorship would be a step toward the White House. Instead it became a step off a cliff.
He was, as he claimed in his campaign, an outsider, which might be the only part of his campaign that turned out to be true. He did not clean up state government, as he promised. His administration is more likely to be remembered for arrogantly being an example of what he promised he would fight.
Six days before he announced he would resign, Team Greitens sent out a typical Greitens message:
“We knew that these baseless allegations would be exposed for what they really are: false attacks brought forward by powerful liberals and Democratic leadership. And that’s exactly what’s happened. The cases against him have been dropped or dismissed.”
Team Greitens knew that not all charges had been dropped or dismissed, knew that the pit was only growing darker. And Team Greitens surely knew the claimed falsity of the attacks was growing weaker by the day or even by the hour.
In his announcement of his impending departure, he went back to familiar themes voiced less than a week earlier that, frankly, sounded convincing only to his do-or-die supporters:
“This ordeal has been designed to cause an incredible amount of strain on my family. Millions of dollars of mounting legal bills, endless personal attacks designed to cause maximum damage to family and friends. Legal harassment of colleagues, friends and campaign workers, and it’s clear that for the forces that oppose us, there is no end in sight. I cannot allow those forces to continue to cause pain and difficulty to the people that I love.”
He can blame the “corrupt career politicians” who were his proclaimed enemies as much as he wants. He can blame “liberals” for destroying the “conservative agenda” he was fighting for as much as he wishes. He can claim the ordeal his family and supporters have been through was “designed.” He hasn’t used the term “fake news” to describe the media that covered his hypocrisies and his personal and political failings, but he did try to control the message and manipulate its delivery as no governor before him had done—and, we hope, as no future governor will try to do—and did blame the media for reporting “lies.”
He can blame everybody he wants to blame but the blame begins and ends with Eric Greitens.
Significantly, he did not announce his planned resignation until a former campaign worker provided some devastating information to the special House committee considering whether to file articles of impeachment and not until a Jefferson City circuit judge had ruled that the committee was legally entitled to obtain documents from the Greitens campaign fund and from the nonprofit organization he set up to push his agenda—including ads attacking those who opposed him, even legislators within his Republican Party.
In truth, Eric Greitens ran for the office of Unit Commander, not Governor. In the end he still has a platoon of loyalists churning out toothless rhetoric blaming everyone for his situation but Eric Greitens. Somewhere along the way this much-vaunted SEAL team member forgot the importance of being part of a team. As far as we know, SEAL teams don’t go around calling each other names and insinuating that they’re not worth being on the same team as the leader. But then, leaders don’t accomplish much when they shoot at the people they need to have behind them.
But Greitens did that repeatedly with his broad-brush condemnation of the members of the General Assembly. He did not seem to recognize during his campaign and never seemed to concede during his time in office that he could accomplish little without forming relationships in the legislature. Somewhere in his highly-publicized great education he apparently ignored the idea that there are three branches of government, not just the one in which he served.
There is a sense of betrayal about the governorship of Eric Greitens. He wasn’t what he said he would be. Some would even argue that he wasn’t even what he said he was.
The saddest thing about Eric Greitens is the damage he has done to others because people like him take others down with them, many of them innocent. All of the people who believed he could take them along in ever-higher circles of power and influence, even as the evidence piled up against him to the contrary, are now his victims, his collateral damage. They now are seeing his disappointment while dealing with their own and that of their friends.
“The time has come…to tend to those that have been wounded, and to care for those who need us most,” he said in his resignation announcement.
“Those who have been wounded” include many voters who supported him because they bought his promises to make government cleaner, more principled, more of a service to all of the people, more honorable. They were not wrong for believing in him because we have to believe in somebody’s words. It would not be surprising if many of those voters who supported him because they deeply distrust government find their distrust even deeper now because Eric Greitens seems to have turned out to be at least as bad as those he disparaged during his campaign. They are collateral damage not just now but perhaps in the future because some will wonder even more if they can trust anybody seeking or serving in public office.
There’s one victim in particular who might be collateral damage, who might be the most wounded of all.
We think of this person because of something we heard another former governor talk about many years ago.
In 1976, Missouri had a young, ambitious governor who was seen as a rising star in the Republican Party, so much so that President Gerald Ford had him on his list of potential running mates when the party held its convention in Kansas City that year. The young governor would be challenged for re-election by a populist who focused his campaign on promising to do what he could not do legally or economically—fire the Public Service Commission and lower utility rates. Christopher Bond and his campaign failed to recognize the popularity of the Joe Teasdale promises, unrealistic though they might be, and never strongly attacked those promises. In November, Bond lost by about 12,000 votes. A career trajectory that might have taken him to the highest national levels nosedived.
Afterwards he spoke of the impact his crushing disappointment had on his then-wife, Carolyn. His dreams of a second term as governor and then a rise to greater position nationally seemingly had been killed by that election outcome. But, he recalled, the burden was double for her. A First Lady of the state, married to a man whose political future seemed unlimited before November, 1976, saw her own dreams crash and burn in that election, too. She had to deal with her disappointment while also dealing with his. She carried a double burden.
We do not presume to know how Sheena Greitens has dealt with, is dealing with, or will deal with the events that have led to her husband’s downfall. The cold reality is that those who attach themselves to a rising star whether family or friends or believers should understand that they can get burned when the star becomes a meteorite. That does not, however, lessen the pain when that happens.
But wallowing in despair will do none of them any good.
The earth won’t stop turning while people such as Eric Greitens and his supporters rant against the collapse of their worlds or mourn their personal losses. History is replete with examples of those who stumble or fall whose dishonor is not their doom.
The premature end of a governorship is not necessarily the end of life in public service, elected or not. And the world doesn’t care if Eric Greitens and his friends feel sorry for themselves. He has no one to blame but himself although it might take a while for him to admit it. He has to get on with life without being in government.
—because government will get on with life without Eric Greitens. And so will the people of Missouri.
We are reminded of some of the words from Carl Sandburg’s great poem, The People, Yes:
The people will live on.
The learning and blundering people will live on.
They will be tricked and sold and again sold
And go back to the nourishing earth for rootholds,
The people so peculiar in renewal and comeback,
You can’t laugh off their capacity to take it…
In the darkness with a great bundle of grief
the people march.
In the night, and overhead a shovel of stars for keeps, the people
march:
“Where to? what next?”
Whether state government learns any lessons from the Greitens experience and in so doing develops the courage to take actions that will rekindle confidence among the people it serves or whether it will allow the people to “be tricked and sold and again sold” is something to watch for. But many people who were skeptical about government before Greitens used that skepticism to help him get elected are even more skeptical when they see how he turned out. The job of turning them around will be even harder now should anyone make a sincere effort to try.
But, as somebody once said, the mission continues.